| CloserLook > Romans > Romans 6:1-23 & 7:1-6 |
Listen
to audio |
|
|||
ROMANS 6:1-23
& 7:1-6
So far, in the book of Romans, we have witnessed the depravity of man, and "the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth ---".
Yes, on the cross of
However, our sins are only the fruit of a very bitter root. You see, we're not sinners because we
have sinned; we sin because we are sinners.
We have been born in sin, and "shapen in iniquity".
In short, we have inherited a sin nature. And it's that natural tendency to disobey God, which has made us His enemies in the first place.
True, upon conversion, the child of
God receives a new nature.
In fact, 2
Cor.5:17 says, --- if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature (or a new creation): old things are passed away; behold, all
things are become new."
And the
scriptures also tell us, that our new nature "--- is created in
righteousness and true holiness".
However,
we didn't receive our new nature in place of our old, we received
it in addition to the old, and herein is the problem.
Yes,
a Christian has two natures, which immediately begs the question, who is in charge.
The answer to
that question is found in the next few chapters, beginning at Rom.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
In last week's lesson, we looked at the source of our sin nature, and discovered we had inherited it from our great ancestor, Adam. Rom.5:12 "Wherefore,
as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death
passed upon all men, for that all have sinned".
Yes, Adam’s disobedience introduced sin into the human race, and
along with it, physical and spiritual death.
From that point on, man's natural tendency has always been, to disobey God.
The result, of course, has been a tremendous burden of sin, separating
us from our Creator, and condemning us to a lost eternity.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Now, someone might say, what do you mean, a natural
tendency to sin?
The best example I can find to explain a natural tendency , is found in the animal kingdom.
A pig has a natural tendency to wallow in mud; in fact, I
have been told it is beneficial to his skin.
On the other hand, a sheep is not made for mud.
Oh, he might slip, and fall into the mud, but with all that wool on his
back, he'd be a sorry mess.
No, he simply isn't made from mud.
Now, as we have just noted, a Christian has two natures, each
having very different natural tendencies.
Yes, a Christian can be a sheep or a pig, but hopefully, not in equal
measure.
No, as far as God is concerned, the sheep should have full sway in the Christian’s life, while the pig should be kept in the place of death.
So let's take a closer look at these two natures.
Before we met Jesus, our old nature was in charge, directing
our steps along the path to eternal damnation.
On the other hand, our new nature, according to Eph.
Quite a contrast, isn't it?
Not surprisingly, what rejoices the one, grieves the
other.
So, once again we have to asked the question, who is in charge?
Well, the answer certainly should be the new nature.
In fact, God has already taken the initiative to make that
happen.
And, as is the case with our salvation, Jesus Christ is at the very
center of His plan.
So whether it be, our salvation, or our victory in Christ, it is all wrapped up in the Son of God.
However, in both cases, God has given us a free choice.
Now, as far as our salvation is concerned, Jesus paid it all.
2 Cor.
Yes, "we might be made the righteousness of God in him", but then again, we might not. In the end, the choice is ours. In like manner, our victory in Christ is irrevocably linked to the Son of God, but once again, we must make the choice. Not once, as in the case of our salvation, but on a daily basis. And that's what chapter 6 is all about. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Chapter 5 concludes with those glorious words, founded in V20,
--- "But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound".
Chapter 6 picks up on this same thought, but with an unusual twist.
V1--- "What shall we say then? Shall we continue in
sin, that grace may abound?"
In
other words, if an increase in sin only causes an increase of grace,
"Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?"
Paul’s answers that question with a resounding "God forbid", and then goes on to
explain, why this is such a bizarre idea.
First of all, we should not "continue in sin" because we are living on the other side of the grave.
Yes, God actually sees us as crucified with Christ, and raised again in newness of
life.
It's an established fact that all Christians should count on.
In fact, it's an established fact,
that Paul expected the Christians in
Listen to his words, found in Rom.6:2-6 "--- How
shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? That's right, in the same way that God has redeemed us by substituting His Son, He has given us
victory by identifying us with Jesus, in His death and resurrection.
And interestingly enough, Christian
baptism is a picture of this very situation.
As we go down into the waters of
baptism, we are symbolically buried with Christ.
And as we are raised up out of the
waters of baptism, we are identified with Him in His resurrection.
Yes, as far as God is concerned "--- our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might
be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin."
However, we must get on board,
so to speak, if we are going to "walk
in newness of life."
Yes, we must get involved.
And in order to emphasize that
point, I have left out the first two words of the verse I have just
quoted.
Actually, the first two words of V6
are --- "Knowing this",
and they changed the whole perspective of the verse.
Certainly, God already knows "our old man is crucified with him, but the point is, do we.
And do we agree with Him when
He says, we "are dead to sin"?
If we do, we will act accordingly.
And certainly, Paul expected the
Christians at
In Eph.4:21-24, he says, "If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by
him, as the truth is in Jesus: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A preacher once illustrated this principle, with the following story. He described the Christian, with his two natures, as a small man taking two rather large dogs for a walk. He then asks the question --- "in which direction will they go." The answer is, "in the direction of the dog, to whom he says sic him". Yes, a Christian must make a deliberate choice, to "put off" the old man and "put on" the new, if he is to expect victory. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ So then, what are the consequences of agreeing
with God, when He says "our old man is crucified with" Christ?
The answer is found in V7 "--- he that is dead is freed from sin."
And doesn't that make sense?
In the natural scheme of things, a corpse is totally unresponsive to sin.
In like manner, if our old man is truly "crucified with him" then we are freed from sin."
But, what if it doesn’t feel like "our old man is
crucified with him".
Well, feelings are important,
but they should never take precedence over the Word of God.
And besides that, our feelings can
be quite undependable.
For example --- Let's suppose, I have just completed a hard
day’s work, followed by a very late night.
The next morning the alarm clock goes
off at
Rubbing my eyes, I take a look at
the clock and say, it sure doesn't feel like
But it is, isn't it?
According to the rotation of the
earth, and all the machinery of the heavens, it's
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Let's take another example,
this time from scripture.
Jesus said, "He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and
shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto
life."
Now let's suppose,
and I sincerely hope this is true, that at some point in your life, you
believed Jesus’ words, and you accept Him as your personal Saviour.
Jesus assures you, that at that point in time, you "passed from death unto life."
Now let us also assume, that at a low point in your life, you really
didn't feel saved.
Do your feelings altar the fact that you have been gloriously saved?
Absolutely
not!
Christ's finished
work on a cross, and His assurance, that you have "passed from death unto life", are entirely unaffected by your feelings.
Your
salvation is a past event.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And this
might be a good time to mention the fact that, a great deal of chapter 6 is
written in the past tense.
You see,
whether it is our individual sins, or as in this case, our sin nature,
all has been dealt with at the cross.
As far as God
is concerned, "our old man is crucified with" Christ.
It's a past event.
So, whether it feels like it
or not, we have every right to put "our old man" in his place.
And we have all of heaven to back
us up.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
But that's only part of the blessing.
Rom. 6:8 also says, "--- if we be dead with Christ, we believe that
we shall also live with him:"
Yes, we are now living on the resurrection
side of the grave.
And, V9-10 say, "Knowing that Christ being raised
from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him. Yes, "he liveth unto God", and so
can we.
And did you notice, V9 says, "death hath no more dominion over
him."
Certainly, there were others in history, who were raised from the dead, but none of
them escaped corruption.
Take Lazarus for instance.
He was gloriously raised from the dead, but he continued to grow old, and one day he was laid to
rest for a second time.
Poor old Lazarus!
But Christ "dieth no more"!
He rose victorious,
over sin and the death!
And V11 says, "Likewise reckon ye also
yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus
Christ our Lord."
Did you notice that little word "reckon".
We are to "reckon" ourselves to be "dead indeed unto sin" and "alive unto God".
Now, the word "reckon", is sort of an accounting term.
When you "reckon" on something, it becomes part of your calculation,
and it affects the bottom line.
You see, its
one thing to know Christ was raised from the dead, to give mental
assent to that fact.
It's quite another, to "reckon" yourself to be "dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto
God".
When you "reckon" on God's proclamation, you build it into the
very fabric of your life.
You actively "--- put off concerning the former conversation (or manner of life) the old man,
which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts" and you "put on the new man, which
after God is created in righteousness and true holiness."
Yes, you must get involved, just
as Paul expected to Christians in
Listen to his words in Rom.6:12-14,
"Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof. I would like to draw your attention
to the words, "reign" in
V12, and "dominion" in
V14.
Before a believer comes to Christ,
sin is like a cruel monarch, reigning over his life with absolute
power.
But things have changed.
A Christian is no longer part
of his cruel domain.
He is "dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God".
And that's why Paul says, in
V12-13, "Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof. No, we shouldn't yield our eyes to lust, or our ears to gossip, or our tongues to lies.
We must keep our bodies in subjection.
And Paul reminds the Corinthian
believers of this very thing, no doubt using the Greek Olympics that were so popular in his day, as an example.
Here's what he says, in 1 Cor.
And then, referring to his own struggle, he
writes --- "I therefore so run, not
as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: That's right, even Paul had to "reckon" on God's proclamation, in order to have a successful ministry. He had to align his will with God’s, and put "off concerning the former
conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful
lusts".
And so must we. We begin by knowing the
facts --- "Knowing this,
that our old man is crucified with him".
Then we must "reckon" upon God's proclamation,
concerning our position in Christ.
And then we must "yield" ourselves "unto God, as those that are alive
from the dead" and our "members
as instruments of righteousness unto God."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V14-15 "For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not
under the law, but under grace. Once again, there's the suggestion that the grace of God might give us a license to sin.
Immediately, Paul responds with an emphatic "God forbid"!
V16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to
obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of
obedience unto righteousness?"
In times past, we were slaves,
but now Christ has set us free.
Should we return our old master?
Absolutely not!
In fact we can not return to
him, at least in the capacity of slaves.
But unfortunately, we can return as willing servants.
Even though we have been rescued
from the penalty of sin, we can willingly serve sin.
However, not only is a sinning
saint a contradiction in terms, it’s a contradiction of his blessed
Lord.
"God forbid", that that such a thing should happen!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
During a dark period in
They were required to serve without remuneration, and without choice.
It made no difference whether they
were employed in a task that was injurious to their health or against
their principles, they must serve.
The same is true of the servant
of sin.
He is employed in his master’s business,
and it matters not that the end thereof is death.
But the Christian has a new
master.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
It must have been a wonderful
day when the African American finally regained his freedom.
A man could, at least in theory,
decide what he would do and where he would go.
Now, I don't want to offend anyone, and I'm certainly not an authority on the subject, but I can't
help wondering if there might have been a few individuals who found this
new situation rather daunting.
You see, for those born into
slavery, not only had they been deprived of their freedom, they had been
deprived of opportunity of directing their own lives.
So perhaps there were some, who opted
for returning to their former masters, not now as slaves, but as servants,
receiving a modest wage.
Of course I don't really know if
this actually happened, but in the spiritual realm, it often does.
Just like the children of
But we're not slaves!
We have a new master, a new nature,
and a new job description.
When "ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness",
but now ye are "free from sin".
Of course, we're not sinlessly perfect.
We can sin, and we do sin, but we shouldn't
"serve sin".
It's not right, and is not necessary.
1 Cor.10:13 says, "There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
As we begin
Chapter 7, we are brought face to face with another reason why sin, in
the life of a believer, is absolutely inappropriate.
V1 "Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?" First of all, Paul establishes a given --- "the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth". And then he zeroes in on one aspect of the law, namely the marriage contract. V2 "For the
woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth ---".
Yes, marriage begins with a solemn promise, given before God. It is a binding contract, in force "unto death due do us part." V2-3 "--- but if the husband be dead, she
is loosed from the law of her husband. And then Paul makes his application. V4 "Wherefore,
my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of
Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised
from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God."
Yes, our relationship with Christ is like a second marriage, the first being terminated by death. However, in this case, it's the death of the wife, rather than the husband, that has ended the marriage. That's right, in the mind of God, "our old
man is crucified with" Christ,
and we are living on the resurrection side of the grave.
As a result, we are free to be "married to
another, even to him who is raised from the dead".
Now, as is often the case, both of these marriages have the potential of producing offspring. In fact, the first marriage already has. V5 "For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death." It was a natural process, wasn't it? Our old union produced sin, which under the Law, could only bring forth death. V6 "But now
we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we
should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter."
And now, as V4 says, our second marriage "--- should bring forth fruit unto God." Yes it "should", but it might not.
Once again, it all depends on our willingness to see things as God does. To "reckon" it to be so, simply because God says it is so. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I would like to conclude our lesson by summarizing what we have learned so far. First of all, "our old man is crucified
with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should
not serve sin."
We have
been "made free from sin" and became "the servants of righteousness."
"God forbid" then, that we should resurrect the old
man, with all his evil desires.
"God forbid" --- that we
should serve that old defeated monarch, who once ruled our lives.
"God forbid" --- that we should creep back to our old slave master, and become his willing servant. And "God forbid" --- that we should return to our old husband,
forsaking our loving bridegroom.
It’s not natural, and it’s not
right.
"But now being made free from sin, and become servants to
God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life."
|
Home | Bio | Site
Map | Genesis | Hebrews | Romans | John | Misc |![]()
; Phone: 519-894-2369