| CloserLook > Genesis > Genesis 3:7-14 |
Listen
to audio |
|
|||
| Download
Audio (Right-Click and select "Save Target As") |
Streaming
Audio (Immediate Playback) |
|||
Genesis 3:7-14Last week we discovered another first.
In Gen. 2:24, God gave mankind His first revelation.
"Therefore shall a man
leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife:
and they shall be one flesh."
Adam spoke these words, but he certainly didn't originate them.
In fact, at that particular time he knew nothing about fathers
and mothers.
He had been created as an adult, never having known
what it was to have parents, and yet he established the correct
relationship between the marriage and the parental bond.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
In Eph. 5:31, Paul makes mention of these historical words, and
in the very next verse, he reveals the mystery that lay behind
this "one flesh" relationship, "-- but I speak concerning Christ and the church."
Also in Math.19, Jesus quoted these words in order to defend
the institution of marriage; and He correctly identified them as God’s
words, not Adam's.
They were God’s first inspired words, and they nail
down the permanence of marriage.
Yes, God intended marriage to be permanent, not only because
it is the fabric of society, but because it was to be a fitting
type of the permanent relationship between Christ and His
Church.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
In chapter 3, we are given an accurate account of Eve's temptation.
The serpent had assured her that, "Ye
shall not surely die", and she swallowed this lie hook line
and sinker.
And in so doing, she allowed the words of a mere creature to
supersede the Words of God.
Psa. 17:4 says "--- by the word of thy lips I have kept me from the paths of the destroyer".
Nevertheless, Eve chose human reasoning, rather than God's
Word, and it led her unerringly to ---
·
the lust of the flesh
·
the lust of the eyes
·
and the pride of life
Relying upon her own investigations, "--- she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat,
and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
At this point I would like to take a moment to consider the basic
changes that must have taken place in Adam and Eve's life, before
they would have ever considered this momentous step.
First of all they must have realized that they would be severing
their relationship with God.
After all, such a step would clearly indicate that they didn't trust Him.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And it all began with Eve.
On the basis of the serpent’s testimony, and as a
result of her own investigations, she was totally convinced
that
Had it really gone that far?
Yes, I'm afraid it had.
After all God had clearly said, "in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."
She knew that; she even told the serpent that . . . but she ate
the forbidden fruit anyway.
Why would she do such a thing?
Was she trying to commit suicide?
Of course she wasn't.
The truth was; she was totally convinced that it wasn't a tree
to be dreaded, but rather, " a tree
to be desired to make one wise".
In fact she staked her life on it.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Secondly, she was convinced that God didn’t really love
them.
She had come to the conclusion that this commandment was based
on an ulterior motive that wasn't in their best interests.
"For God doth know" ---
doth know what?
That --- "ye shall
be as gods, knowing good and evil."
And she believed it!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thirdly, she thought she could outsmart God.
Oh, we'll call His bluff.
We’ll eat of the tree anyway, and "be as gods".
He can’t keep us down!
Oh yes, we’ve got a little more than stealing apples here!
We’ve got total rebellion.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
However, it might surprise us to learn that God didn't hold her chiefly
responsible.
In fact scripture tells us, that it was Adam not Eve, who was
credited with plunging humanity into sin.
We see that in Rom. 5:12 "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death
by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:"
Certainly Adam and Eve were much alike in their
disobedience, in the sense that they both rejected God’s
commandment, but their pathway to disobedience was completely
different.
And 1 Timothy
"And Adam was not
deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression."
Oh she was in the transgression all right, that fact cannot be
denied, but she was deceived.
As we have already pointed out, she had swallowed Satan’s
lie, hook line and sinker.
However, according to 1 Tim. 2:14, "Adam was not deceived".
Apparently he wasn't taken in by the serpent's wild story
about becoming "as gods".
Then why did he do it?
What motivated him to disobey God?
I think Gen.3:6 gives us a clue.
It says, Eve "took
of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband
with her; and he did eat."
Notice the time difference?
When Adam made his fateful decision, Eve had already eaten.
So there was a period of time, be it ever so brief, when
Eve was a fallen sinner and Adam was not.
The most striking consequence of this unusual situation was
the fact that Eve was now under Satan's control, rather than
God's.
As Jesus pointed out in John
And just like Satan himself, no sooner had she become a sinner,
than she became a tempter.
Oh Satan was very clever, wasn't he?
He used the most subtle animal in God's creation to tempt Eve,
and then he used that very special person; that unique individual whom
God had created especially for Adam, to bring him down.
So ladies, be very careful of that tremendous influence you have
on you're husband, and commit it unto the Lord.
Fulfill the words of Prov. 31:12 --"She will do him good and not evil all
the days of her life."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Some people have made the romantic suggestion that Adam
decided to share his wife’s fallen condition rather than
go on without her.
If that is true, he cannot be commended for his choice.
Yes, if that is really true, then he chose the gift rather
than the Giver.
Unlike the second Adam, he was not willing to say "nevertheless not as I will, but as
thou wilt."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So Eve "gave also
unto her husband with her; and he did eat."
On this particular occasion Eve took the leadership, and
it is interesting to note that from that point on, Adam was given the
responsibility of leadership in their family.
However that isn't the real problem, for up until then,
Adam didn't rule over his wife.
No, the problem wasn't the fact that she took the leadership,
the problem was she exercised faulty and rebellious leadership.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
However, Adam didn’t need to follow her did he?
He still had the power of choice, even though it would
have cost him dearly.
And God made that point very clear in V17, "Because thou hast hearkened unto the
voice of thy wife".
Yes, Adam listened to his wife, and then with his eyes wide
open, for he was not deceived, he ate of the forbidden
fruit.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So the bottom line is this.
No one forced either of them to eat of the forbidden fruit,
it was their own choice.
Eve chose to believe the serpent rather than
And Adam decided to follow his wife rather than God; and
the results were immediate.
V7 "And the eyes of
them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked".
Satan sort of told them the truth, didn't he?
He said, "in the day
ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened", and they
certainly were!
He also told them that they would know "good and evil", and that was true also.
And in any way it was true that they became "as gods".
In V22
Yes it was the truth, but it wasn't the whole truth.
And the very first thing their newly acquired conscience told
them was, "they were naked".
So, as is always the case, Satan’s twisted truths are lies.
They knew good, without the power to
do it, and they knew evil, without the power to avoid it.
And because of their disobedience they now had a sin nature,
and a conscience to point out their shortcomings.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I have a question to ask you.
Was the knowledge of good and evil, and this sudden awareness
of nakedness just a coincidence, or did the one produce the
other?
Actually, we only have to look around us to find the answer.
Both animals and human babies have no psychological need for clothing,
and both have no moral knowledge of good and evil.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So let's examine this new possession that Adam and Eve
paid so dearly for.
Our conscience is a lot like physical pain.
Both are a warning system to let us know when something
is wrong.
However, pain in itself does not give us good health, nor
does our conscience automatically bring us into a right relationship with
God.
They are only a warning system to encourage us to take the appropriate
action.
In the case of physical pain, we can do one of three things:
·
We can use a home remedy.
We're not really sure if it works, but at least were doing something.
·
Or we can use pain killers to
help us ignore the problem.
·
Or we can go to a qualified physician and
let him treat the malady.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And we have just about the same three choices when it comes
to our conscience.
For instance, Adam and Eve tried the # 1 option.
Yes, they tried a home remedy -- "they knew that they were naked; and they
sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons."
This has always been a very popular solution.
Down through the ages, man has devised many home remedies for
his sin problem.
Religions abound, with more being added every
day.
And like Adam’s fig leaves, they give us a certain amount
of respectability, at least among our fellowmen, but not before
God.
On that terrible day when we stand before our Maker, all the bloodless
religions in the world will be about as effective as Adam’s fig
leaves.
V10 "And he said,
I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was
naked; and I hid myself."
Yes, in spite of the fact that he was clothed in a garment of his
own making, Adam was still naked.
Someone has made the comment --- human religion continually
strives to be clothed, while Christianity is founded upon the
fact of being clothed!
The starting point of the one is the unobtainable goal of
the other.
And because the fig leaves really didn't suffice Adam and
Eve "-- hid themselves
from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Yes, they hid from God, which is a lot like option #
2.
And many people still use the pain killer approach, to
deaden their conscience.
In fact conscience pain-killers have always been a hot
item.
·
alcohol and drugs
·
endless entertainment
·
the continual
accumulation of new things.
·
or just
plain busyness; no time to think about God.
However just like Adam, we can’t hide from God forever,
for "--- it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment".
Far better, to let our conscience lead us to the
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V8 "And they heard
the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the
day".
I'm sure they recognized His voice, and probably they also recognized
the time.
Yes, it was "the cool
of the day".
Adam’s work would have been over, and they would have been
looking forward to their Creator's visit.
It had always been a welcome voice, and a welcome visit,
but not on that evening.
On that particular evening everything was different, because Adam
and Eve were different!
V8 "--- and Adam and his wife hid themselves from
the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden."
They had obtained the knowledge of good and evil only to find
it condemn them.
And to gain this prize, they had lost:
·
their peace
·
their fellowship with God
And had inherited:
·
corruption
·
fear
·
and a sin nature
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V9 "And the LORD God
called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?"
This question proved two things:
·
man was lost
·
and
In short, it demonstrated man’s sin and
Satan had based his whole argument on the premise that God really didn’t
love them.
However the fall of man, which had been so cleverly engineered
by Satan, was to prove the opposite.
Yes God is love, and His very words, "Where art thou?" demonstrated that fact.
Oh, God wasn't looking for Adam and Eve; He knew exactly
where they were.
You see people aren't lost because
And that is the first requirement of salvation.
Math.11:28 "Come
unto me, all ye that labour and are
heavy laden, and I will give you rest."
However, people can't come until they have heard God’s voice,
and that’s where we come in.
Yes, "--- we are ambassadors
for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's
stead, be ye reconciled to God. 2 Cor.5:20
They need to hear God’s voice, and they need to respond.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Why were Adam and Eve hiding among " the trees of the garden", rather then anticipating God's visit?
Adam was quite clear on that point, V10 "--- I heard thy voice
in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and
I hid myself."
This was the first time in their lives that they had been afraid
of God.
They were afraid because they were naked and because they
were sinners, and their conscience
made that point the very clear.
Yes, they knew themselves very well, but as yet, they really
didn’t know
Oh there would be consequences all right, but there would also
be mercy.
There would be mercy because, God is love.
And that’s what every fallen Adam needs to know.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V11 "And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked?
Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?"
That is the next step on the pathway to reconciliation.
Adam needed to confront his sin, confess it, and repent.
1John 1:9 says "If
we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us
our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
But Adam wasn’t about to do that!
Gen. 3:12 "And the
man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and
I did eat."
Here stands self-righteous Adam.
He had lost:
·
his dominion
·
his dignity
·
his happiness
·
his innocence
·
and his peace
But it wasn't his fault!
Actually, it was kind of God’s fault, wasn't it?
It was "The woman
whom thou gavest to be with me",
that
"gave me of the tree".
So it was kind of God’s fault, and it was definitely Eve's
fault, but it wasn't my fault!
Sounds familiar doesn’t it?
Don't blame me ---
·
it’s my parents fault
·
it’s my
rotten luck.
·
I know I have a bad temper; but I
got it from my Uncle Ben, and so on.
No repentance there!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V13 "And the LORD
God said unto the woman, What is this that
thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me,
and I did eat."
Both Adam and Eve admitting the fact that they "did eat", but they still wouldn't
accept the responsibility for their actions.
Adam had only eaten because his wife gave him the fruit,
and Eve made it very clear that "The
serpent beguiled" her.
So one after the other, they passed the buck, and the serpent
didn't a leg to stand on!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
But actually, none of them had a leg to stand on.
Each one of them had a choice, and they had made that choice.
1 Cor.
He couldn't push Jesus off that pinnicle of
the temple.
He could only suggest that He cast himself down.
He could concoct a story to play on Eve's suspicions and
appeal to her pride, but he couldn't force the forbidden fruit down
her throat.
So in the end it was Eve's choice, and it was Adam's choice, and
it is our choice.
No, that little story about the Devil made me do it, just doesn't
hold water.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And when God said, "What
is this that thou hast done?" He wasn't looking for excuses,
or even information; He was looking for repentance.
And had there been any, He would have cleansed them.
"If we confess our
sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse
us from all unrighteousness." 1 John 1:9
However, repentance was not forthcoming, so He turned to
the serpent.
V14 "And the LORD
God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art
cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon
thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou
eat all the days of thy life".
Did you notice the difference?
There wasn't any -- "What
is this that thou hast done" was there?
Instead there was immediate judgment --- "Because
thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle".
If Adam and Eve had repented, no doubt their judgment would
have been much lighter.
And certainly God had sought them out, and He had reasoned with
them.
"What is this that thou
hast done?" --- didn't you realize the consequences?
And He'll always do that.
Isaiah
However, He has never made that kind of an offer to Satan, or
to the fallen angels, or even to the serpent.
No, only mankind is the undeserving recipient of God’s
unmerited favour through Jesus Christ.
For them . . .
·
He seeks
·
He reasons
·
He redeems
·
and He saves
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And there was something else that distinguished the serpent’s
judgment from Adam and Eve’s.
What did God mean in V4 when He said, "--thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field"?
Well there are several things to consider here, but for now we
will just look at one fact.
The serpent's curse was never lifted.
In a previous lesson we talked about the bondage that creation
is still under, because of man’s sin.
Rom.8:20 "For the
creature (or creation) was
made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath
subjected the same in hope".
In the beginning, both man and animals were vegetarians, but not
now.
In today's world, wild animals must be alert every moment, or
they will die.
However, this will not always be the case.
As we learned in Isaiah 11: 6-10, all creation will be restored
to its original state during the millennium.
I won't read all these verses again, but you will remember that
during Christ's thousand year reign, -- "The wolf" will "dwell
with the lamb" and "the
lion shall eat straw like the ox".
God had given Adam dominion over all creation, and when
he fell creation was pulled down with him, and again after the flood,
it descended into what we now call the law of the wild.
None of this was a result of their own actions, it was imposed
upon them because of man's sin.
So it is fitting, when the second Adam reigns over this earth,
that creation will be released from this bondage.
However the serpent, who was truly guilty, was "cursed above all cattle, and above every
beast of the field", and will not take part in this
restoration.
No, there’s no good news for him, just righteous
judgment.
Like the unrepentant sinner, his punishment will be forever.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And just like Isaiah 11:6-10 that we studied last week, Isaiah
65:18-25 also speaks of the millennium, but with this important
difference.
Its emphasis is upon
We will be reading the entire portion, but I would like you to
pay particular attention to the last verse.
Isaiah 65:18-25 "But
be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold,
I create
25: The wolf
and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like
the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall
not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain,
saith the LORD."
Did you see that?
The wolf and the lamb and the lion and the bullock will be released from
the bondage they have endured because of man, but not the serpent,
---
"and dust shall be the serpent's
meat."
So when you see a serpent crawling in the dust, and you realize
that he will never be restored to the elegant animal he once
was; just thank the Lord for the unmerited favour He
has extended to mankind, through Jesus Christ.
|
Home | Bio | Site
Map | Genesis | Hebrews | Romans | John | Misc |![]()
; Phone: 519-894-2369